We recently passed the anniversary of last November’s attacks by Muslim fanatics in Paris. Enough days have gone by to go ahead and recall the insane fantasy scapegoats dreamed up by Left-Wing Archie Bunkers the night of the attacks.
From last year:
“Regular readers of Balladeer’s Blog know I’m not a Conservative but I always like to point out that that does NOT make me a Liberal. American Liberals are cowardly hypocrites, pompous snobs and hilariously pretentious asses. They’re also the ultimate imbeciles, as shown by their reaction to Friday’s Muslim attacks in Paris.
I waited hours before I posted anything, just to make absolutely sure it was Muslims behind the attacks and that credit was being claimed by the Islamic State spawned by Barack Obama’s premature withdrawal from Iraq. I always check out both Liberal AND Conservative websites because it’s the only way to get the whole picture.
Shortly after the attacks I felt a renewed contempt for American Liberals as I read the comments they were leaving on Huffpo, Salon and all the other sites that are big with the left. The overwhelming majority of the commentors were insisting the attacks could not POSSIBLY be by Muslim fanatics.
The Liberal buffoons were insisting the attacks in France must have been committed by … right-wing anti-environmentalists. No, I’m NOT joking. Liberals are so officially detached from reality that they fabricated a pack of right-wing fanatics wanting to attack Paris in advance of the Climate Summit. To them this was more reasonable than acknowledging that it might be yet another of the countless Muslim attacks that happen daily. (See my roundups if you doubt the “daily” part.)
Let me emphasize that for overseas readers. Rational people were thinking “This could well be ANOTHER attack by Muslim fanatics since they’re so prone to this type of violence but let’s wait for all the facts to make sure.” And while those rational people were thinking along those lines Liberal fools were harassing people making that rational observation and were instead pushing the notion that imaginary right-wing anti-environmentalists were behind the attacks. Anything to defend Islam. Continue reading
Once Donald Trump is sworn in as president I will naturally switch to criticizing him the way ALL U.S. presidents should be criticized. In the meantime here are some light-hearted thoughts on the pros and cons of Trump’s election.
CON: THE REPUBLICAN PARTY GOT SOME UNDESERVED BENEFITS FROM TRUMP’S POPULARITY – The bad news is that the Republicans held on to both the Senate and the House AND picked up some additional governorships. RepubCorp does NOT deserve such fringe benefits from Trump’s election.
PRO: Trump’s election has inspired the insane American Left to drive away even more people from their 1960s worldview. 
CON: America’s Democratic and Republican Parties have proven they STILL plan to stand athwart their own constituents crying “halt!”




My take (for anybody who cares) will follow these light-hearted potential headlines.
VOTERS TO OBAMA: DROP DEAD
TRUMP DOUBLES GOP’s USUAL AFRICAN-AMERICAN VOTE, PROVING WHAT A RACIST HE IS …?
It’s Election Day once again, which means I will soon have a different president to criticize. Yes, I despised George W Bush as well as Obama but I often pointed out how pathetic I found Obama worshippers to be for continuing to whine about Bush long after he was out of office. All presidents try to blame their predecessors, but only fools continue to let them get away with it.
Remember how earlier this year the Austrian elections had to be scheduled for a “redo” because of VOTE FRAUD? Hillary “Bugsy” Clinton is terrified that her party’s vote fraud will be called out as well. (Their fraud cons are why they always oppose Voter I.D.)

