Tag Archives: Political Correctness

RESEARCH FELLOW: AMERICAN COLLEGES ARE CREATING A GENERATION OF BIGOTS

teresa-mullHere in (Ivory Tower)-land things become what they are called rather than being called what they are.” – From Aristophanes’ satire The Birds

Balladeer’s Blog has often covered the Faculty Lounge Fascists who pretend to be “educators” (LMFAO) at American colleges and universities. Those secular missionaries for the Democrats are either Left-Wing Archie Bunkers from the 1960s generation OR had the misfortune of being “educated” (LMFAO) by Left-Wing Archie Bunkers from the 1960s generation. 

Call them what you will but they continue to stand athwart the maturation process crying “halt,” to twist a very old saying. Below is a link to an article by Teresa Mull who discusses the closing of young minds on American campuses.

Continue reading

2 Comments

Filed under Education or Indoctrination, LIBERALS AND CONSERVATIVES, opinion

SAVE DILBERT’S CREATOR FROM A WITCH HUNT

dilbertMy disgust with American Liberals and Conservatives is no secret by this point. Like so many of us I used to identify as a Liberal until they became as intolerant of free speech and opposing viewpoints as the worst Christian Conservatives had ever been.

The American Left has also proven to be hypocritical about blacklisting and political witch hunts, since they are more than happy to destroy lives in their obsessive targeting of anyone who disagrees with them.

NOW EVEN THE CREATOR OF DILBERT IS UNDER ATTACK: CLICK HERE   Continue reading

2 Comments

Filed under LIBERALS AND CONSERVATIVES

DISCUSSIONS ON MUSLIM VIOLENCE

Mascot with demo and repub heads

The symbol of the nonexistent Balladeer Political Party

It’s no secret that American Liberalism has alienated countless former allies with its insane fondness for ONLY the most backward, misogynistic and homophobic elements of Islam. Not only do Liberals pompously dismiss Muslims who embrace the West and the 21st Century as “Western Triumphalists” who have “internalized Western oppression” but Liberals have also become THE biggest obstacle to adult discussions about Muslim violence.  

ALL attempts to discuss Muslim violence get stagnated at the simple-minded pee-pee ca-ca level because American Liberals always think they’re being deep by pointing out the obvious – that not all Muslims go around killing people. Well, not all gun owners go around killing people, either, but you’ll never hear Liberals saying that means we should NEVER discuss mass shootings. But hey, it’s not news that American Liberals are spineless hypocrites.

Even though it’s a given that not all Muslims are terrorists the shallow, preening jackasses of the American Left STILL act like they are bringing some heavy-duty thinking to the argument by reciting that same tired refrain over and over again. That’s because American Liberals care only about their own egos and their pretensions. In their adolescent drama-queen minds they think they’re fighting battles of the past. Battles whose outcomes are already known.

liberals crying racismIn the deluded minds of American Liberals they are taking on mobs of ignorant people who just don’t understand that not all Muslims use violence. Ironically, the only Muslims who benefit from this refusal to openly discuss Muslim fascism are the violent, reactionary types who perpetuate misogny, homophobia and all of Islam’s other examples of intolerance and savage superstition. (Killing people for drawing pictures? Really?)   Continue reading

20 Comments

Filed under LIBERALS AND CONSERVATIVES, opinion

SMACKING DOWN THE EXCUSES OF GUTLESS GROVELERS FOR ISLAM

Muhammad bombMUSLIM VIOLENCE AWARENESS YEAR CONTINUES!

It’s entertaining listening to the hypocritical sniveling of people who are far too cowardly to criticize the violent fanatics of Islam. The more that the latest Muslim atrocities (and they perpetrate atrocities every single day) highlight the cowardice of their enablers the louder those gutless hypocrites howl in an attempt to deflect attention from their own craven behavior.

Here are some quick smackdowns that let you, too, join in the fun of casually dismissing the wimpy excuses of these would-be Kapos who hope Muslim fanatics will attack the rest of us first.

Gultess hypocrite Ben Affleck was happy to criticize Christians in the movie Dogma but crawls for Islam.

Gutless hypocrite Ben Affleck was happy to criticize Christians in the movie Dogma but crawls for Islam.

GUTLESS HYPOCRITE COMMENT: Dude, like, we shouldn’t like, let the actions of SOME Muslims, like, color our feelings about, like, all of the Muslim world.

SMACKDOWN: Tell them that the minute sniveling little shits like them stop acting like the actions of SOME Americans, or SOME white people, or SOME Christians or SOME cops represent the actions of ALL Americans, or ALL white people, or ALL Christians or ALL cops you’ll consider that. (HINT: Cowardly hypocrites will NEVER stop making sweeping negative generalizations about Americans or white people or Christians or cops so there is no danger of ever having to deal with a followup on this one. The reason they won’t stop? Because it’s SAFE to generalize about those targets.)

GUTLESS HYPOCRITE COMMENT: Dude, it is so totally not awesome to, like, discuss actions that would affect ALL Muslims after violent incidents that involve, like, some people who just happen to be Muslims.

SMACKDOWN: This one is just a variation of the first one (gutless hypocrites are very unoriginal thinkers). The smackdown is: So you’re saying it’s wrong to discuss actions that would affect ALL gun owners after violent incidents that involve some people who just happen to be gun owners?

Muslim oppression 3GUTLESS HYPOCRITE COMMENT: Dude, people shouldn’t be allowed to criticize Islam because you can’t, like, shout “fire” in a crowded theater. (This one will be accompanied by one of those looks that lets you know the gutless hypocrite who said this thinks it’s a Really Deep Thought instead of the easily dismissed excuse that it really is.)

SMACKDOWN: Yes you CAN shout “fire” in a crowded theater IF THERE’S A FIRE! Even if it APPEARS there is a fire (excessive smoke, etc) you have a responsibility to speak out so other theatergoers are made aware of the danger and can take appropriate action. Cowardly apologists for Islam act like Muslim violence is purely hypothetical and that there’s never been any real-world violence from Muslim fanatics.

GUTLESS HYPOCRITE COMMENT: Dude, are you, like, implying we should commit certain acts against Muslims?

SMACKDOWN: Nope. Cowardly enablers of Muslim violence always act like the only two options are: 1) Do and say and write absolutely NOTHING about Muslim intolerance or 2) Wage all-out war. If people in the Western Democracies would start verbally holding Islam as accountable as other faiths for its homophobia, misogyny and other forms of intolerance the message might get through with no need for any violence.

Trouble is, cowardly apologists for Islam are too timid to even use WORDS against Muslim intolerance. Unfortunately, with religious fanatics if you are too frightened to use WORDS against them you will eventually have to use MORE than words against them. And we’ve seen that collaborators with Islam are far too spineless to ever use more than words, hence their pre-emptive surrender.     Continue reading

4 Comments

Filed under LIBERALS AND CONSERVATIVES, opinion

LIBERAL EXCEPTIONALISM IS AS ABSURD A NOTION AS AMERICAN EXCEPTIONALISM

Mascot 1

Here at Balladeer’s Blog I often get asked why I criticize both American Liberals AND American Conservatives. American Liberals are usually the ones who are stunned that other people don’t share their high opinion of themselves. That makes it as much fun to puncture the pomposity of American Liberals as it always was to lampoon holier-than-thou Christian Conservatives.  

*** AMERICAN LIBERALS ARE BIGOTS WITH SELF-CONSTRUCTED HALOS: The hilariously pretentious asses of American Liberalism have AT LEAST as many prejudices and bigotries as anyone else ever has but they go around convinced that they are THE moral models for the rest of the world.  

What’s even funnier is when the cowardly hypocrites who now call themselves Liberals try to take credit for the past accomplishments of courageous people. I mean the kind of courageous people who took stands when they faced genuine danger for doing so. American Liberals are gutless wonders who try to act like they would have had enough backbone to openly oppose the Nazis or 1950s blacklisting.

Mascot with demo and repub heads

The symbol of the nonexistent Balladeer Political Party

No, “Liberals,” it’s pretty clear that you would NOT have been brave enough to do so. Right now you have the opportunity to openly oppose the violence, homophobia and misogyny of Muslim fanatics but you’re too cowardly to do so. Instead of speaking out about those modern-day versions of Nazis you ally yourselves with them, especially the repulsive Liberals of the “academic” (LMFAO) world who seem willing to be Kapos for Islamofascism.

Even worse you ignore and even try to CENSOR Muslims who courageously speak out against the fanatics, even blocking them from speaking at universities. The preening jackasses of the American Left support ONLY Muslims who hate the west and who want to live in the past. Continue reading

6 Comments

Filed under LIBERALS AND CONSERVATIVES

CAMILLE PAGLIA ON CENSORSHIP BY LEFT-WING ARCHIE BUNKERS

Muslim oppression 3Once again Camille Paglia shines in an examination of various subjects near and dear to my heart – censorship by the Political Correctness Police, the way the American Left crawls for Islam and how pretentious Liberal asses have destroyed the concept of intellectual inquiry and the free exchange of ideas in the academic world. She nicely chronicles the decline of American colleges and universities into their present state as the Democratic Party’s secular churches. 

An extra bit of fun is the way many of her remarks reinforce the remarks I made recently about the way that the worst of the faux “intellectuals” of the self-centered 1960s Liberals avoided failure in the real world by hiding in the prolonged adolescence of the academic world. Unfortunately they felt their job as “teachers” was to abuse their authority over their students by browbeating them into agreeing with their outdated (by FIVE DECADES now) political opinions. 

PAGLIA’S KILLER ARTICLE IS HERE 

MY REMARKS (REFERRED TO ABOVE) APPEARED HERE

 

6 Comments

Filed under LIBERALS AND CONSERVATIVES

RAGING CONTROVERSY OVER A RECENT POST

Mascot FOUR original pics

Balladeer’s Blog

Here at Balladeer’s Blog I criticize both American Liberals and American Conservatives. At this particular point in history the Liberals are so self-infatuated and are so pompous they are even MORE fun to ridicule than Christian Conservatives used to be. 

I’ve been getting bombarded with emails from Liberals expressing their usual outrage when other people don’t praise them the way they praise themselves constantly. The cause for this most recent storm was my examination of how Aristophanes’ comedy The Birds could be adapted to fit the present day. Does it deserve THIS much outrage? TO JUDGE FOR YOURSELF CLICK HERE 

4 Comments

Filed under LIBERALS AND CONSERVATIVES

THE BIRDS (c 414/6 BC): ANCIENT GREEK COMEDY BY ARISTOPHANES

Birds by Aristophanes 1Balladeer’s Blog presents another examination of an ancient Greek political satire. This comedy by Aristophanes was one that I was planning on covering very soon when I started posting my reviews of Attic Old Comedy years ago. For various reasons it kept falling by the wayside.

Where am I going with this? For Aristophanes’ line “In Cloud-Cuckooland things become what they are called rather than being called what they are” make it “In Ivory Towerland things become what they are called rather than being called what they are.” But I’m getting ahead of myself.

The Birds is Aristophanes’ lengthiest surviving comedy and also the most analyzed (some would say over-analyzed). So much has already been written about this particular work that I’ve decided to forego my usual intensive examination of every scene. Instead I’ll go with a brief synopsis followed by a way I feel The Birds could be adapted (as opposed to translated) for the present day. 

SYNOPSIS

Birds by Aristophanes 2More than 2,300 years before George Orwell’s Animal Farm and 1984, Aristophanes was dealing with some of the same political themes. 

Pisthetaerus and Euelpides, Athenians feeling alienated by the increasingly restrictive laws and lawsuits of their home city have left Athens behind to start over with a new society. Part of the comedy centers around the ages-old theme of how those who seek to overthrow oppression often wind up becoming the new oppressors themselves. (Think of the 1960s generation of American liberals who became just as oppressive as they claimed previous generations had been) 

Another Orwellian theme finds Aristophanes satirizing the way in which the ruling class in any society uses and corrupts language to strengthen the subjugation of the populace. The Birds even features the importance of religious and historical myths in any culture as the leaders of the new civilization conjure up an all-new cosmology with “the birds” at the center to justify their own rule. Continue reading

72 Comments

Filed under Ancient Greek Comedy, Education or Indoctrination

FREE SPEECH, LIBERALS AND CONSERVATIVES

Muslim oppression 3Free Speech has been under assault by both Liberals and Conservatives in recent decades. There was a time when Liberals actively supported freedom of expression because they understood it was THE primary freedom from which all other freedoms flowed. The early figures from my own country’s history protected speech with the FIRST Amendment to the Constitution because they knew all too well that ideas that are considered taboo and offensive today might be considered essential truths by future generations.

The forever-hypocritical 1960s generation of American Liberals were all about Free Speech when THEIR ideas were the ones offending people. Once they considered themselves to be comfortably in the cultural, educational and political driver’s seat by the early 1990s they decided they wanted their own already outdated worldview enshrined in stone and presented as THE one true set of values.

Free speech is a civil rightThey became the Political Correctness Police and anyone who offended their 1960s attitudes had to be silenced because – as they knew so well from their own experience – when controversial ideas are given the room to breathe they can often thrive. The totalitarian asses of the 1960s can’t bear the fact that younger people might have opinions that offend THEM as much as their opinions offended their parents’ generation. 

And it’s not just in America. All around the world similar assaults on Freedom of Expression are being made. If Muslims are offended they want the offensive material banned, if authoritarian regimes like the one in China are offended they want the offensive material banned, and on and on it goes. Considering that the more easily offended someone is the less intelligent they tend to be I find it amazing that Politically Correct censorship has thrived the way it has.

Free Speech 2Keep in mind Spinoza’s wonderful line “Every man should think what he likes and say what he thinks.” That still rings true because no matter what the hypersensitive fools who want to censor the rest of us find offensive NONE of them has the right to try to extinguish one single product of the human mind. Continue reading

4 Comments

Filed under LIBERALS AND CONSERVATIVES

OTHERS REFLECT ON THE MUSLIM WORLD’S WAR ON THE CIVILIZED WORLD

liberal cowardice

*** *** *** *** ** *** *** *** LIBERAL COWARDICE IN ONE LITTLE POSTER.

For a nice change of pace here are some quotes from other people regarding the centuries-old conflict between the Muslim World and the Western World. These people recognize – like I do – that the Western World’s biggest liability has turned out to be the preening jackasses of the political left who pretend they’re being “understanding” to try to hide their cowardice.  

Mark Steyn on Belgium’s decision to move airport security perimeters back and pretend that accomplishes something:  “If we’re going to move the security perimeter back, why don’t sovereign nations move it back to their own national borders by not importing and expanding the high-risk population in which terrorism incubates?

“But no, that’s apparently too obvious. Europe would rather destroy itself than retreat from the delusions of multiculturalism. And so once free peoples must get used to ever more indignities and inconveniences, and ultimately a lot less of core liberties like freedom of expression and freedom of movement. The geniuses of the EU political class have decided not to solve the problem but to manage it, via ever more constraints on you.”

From Judith Bergman: “The Western narrative represents a complete refusal to examine the doctrines of Islam, out of fear of offending Muslims. This is not a purely European phenomenon. The Obama Administration ordered a cleansing of (homeland security) training materials that Islamic groups deemed offensive.”

Teun Voten on Belgium as a microcosm for the way Political Correctness does nothing but cripple serious attempts to deal with Muslim fascism: “The most important factor is Belgium’s culture of denial… Observers who point to unpleasant truths such as the high incidence of crime among Moroccan youth and violent tendencies in radical Islam are accused of being propagandists of the extreme-right, Continue reading

7 Comments

Filed under LIBERALS AND CONSERVATIVES