Not even the Democrats’ many, many media outlets can censor ALL the reports regarding the latest explosive revelations about the Joe Biden Crime Family and its Underboss Hunter Biden. The Democrats at social media outlets have been working overtime to provide cover for the Biden campaign on the scandals.
It’s easier to find the story in which the Boilermakers Union publicly corrected Senile Joe Biden when he lied about getting their endorsement than it is to find the full details about the Biden/ Burisma scandal. (The union really endorsed Trump)
At Facebook, one of the Democrat-run social media sites trying to censor the Biden emails story, their Global Policy Manager for “content regulation” AKA CENSORSHIP is Biden associate Anna Makanju, WHO ADVISED JOE BIDEN ABOUT UKRAINE POLICY WHEN HE WAS VICE PRESIDENT AND THE BURISMA SCANDAL’S SEEDS WERE SOWN. Is Anna mentioned in some of the unpublished documents? I don’t know but a reasonable person might well wonder.
And as if Joe Biden’s lies and corruption weren’t revolting enough, here’s Australian news with ANOTHER reminder of how the American media is trying to shore up Senile Joe and his campaign:
The symbol of the nonexistent Balladeer Political Party
Balladeer’s Blog remains the only site on the web that criticizes American Liberals and Conservatives equally. Let’s have fun pondering a few concepts.
Regular readers here know I openly supported gay marriage YEARS before the weak, inept and crooked little man named Barack Obama did. I still do, so understand at the top that I’m presenting this topic as a hypothetical for discussion’s sake.
When the news came out about Facebook’s blatant censorship of various subjects like Muslim homophobia and misogyny or corruption scandals in one particular political party I was curious how a lot of Facebook consumers would react. Some were outraged, but the usual brigade of people who can talk themselves out of EVER taking a stand on any issue mumbled about how “it’s Zuckerberg’s company … he can run it the way he likes.”
Okay, so if you feel that one percenter Mark Zuckerberg can run HIS company however he pleases and can ban items he disagrees with, why is it wrong for bakery owners to refuse to bake wedding cakes for gay couples? The same principle should apply in BOTH cases: either Zuckerberg should be forced to stop discriminating against consumers who want to use HIS public business OR bakery owners should be free to say they don’t want their public business to be forced to participate in things that offend THEM. Continue reading