Tag Archives: cowardly American Liberals

THE RIGHT SIDE OF HISTORY: AMERICAN LIBERAL MYTHOLOGY

Mascot FOUR original pics

Balladeer’s Blog

I’m an atheist but I love exploring the mythology behind the world’s various belief systems. American Liberalism has regressed into a faith-based belief system that’s every bit as irrational as any other religion, but since American Liberals – or “Liberal Fundamentalists” – are such pompous, hypocritical and close-minded fools it’s A LOT of fun to describe their myths as sarcastically as possible.

THE RIGHT SIDE OF HISTORY – The American Liberal version of an afterlife. American Liberals strive to live their lives in such a way that people every bit as pretentious and snobbish as they are will sit around in the future sipping wine and pompously expressing approval of the worldview and political opinions that today’s Liberal Fundamentalists held while alive.

This notion of an afterlife is every bit as flawed and fantastic as any other religion’s tales about what happens after human beings die. No one alive today knows how the people of the future will feel about any of us or about our worldview.

SnobIf anything history has shown that people – ESPECIALLY the self-congratulatory asses called Liberals – take great delight in loudly and repeatedly condemning people of the past for (GASP) having opinions that differ from their own. It takes no courage and little effort to put on an air of moral superiority toward long-dead human beings.

That being said it’s more likely that American Liberals of the future will look down on even the most self-consciously “progressive” Puritans of today as hopelessly misguided or simply ignorant. Those future Liberal Fundamentalists very well may just sit around sipping wine and reassuring each other that they are morally superior to every Liberal of this era for not having THE EXACT SAME opinions as they do regarding race, gender, etc . Exactly like pompous Liberal Fundamentalists of today do with people of the past. 

The obsessive conformity, status-anxiety and insecurities of American Liberals prevent them from questioning their faith and thereby realizing that their own condemnation of figures from long ago is every bit as much of a shallow, meaningless pose as the attitude that may be shown by Liberal Fundamentalists of the future. FOR MY LOOK AT THE DEITIES OF AMERICAN LIBERAL MYTHOLOGY CLICK HERE   

OR IF YOU PREFER: Continue reading

Advertisements

2 Comments

Filed under LIBERALS AND CONSERVATIVES, opinion

AMERICAN LIBERALS AND THEIR MUSLIM FETISH EXPLAINED

Islam and liberalWelcome back to Balladeer’s Blog, the only site on the web that criticizes American Liberals and Conservatives equally! Reasonable people are often very puzzled by the gutless hypocrisy of Liberals when it comes to Islam. After all, Islam is the most homophobic, misogynistic and otherwise intolerant religion in the world at this particular point in history. Yet despite that, American Liberals are too cowardly to criticize Muslims the same way they criticize Christians or Jews.

I’ll try to put it in perspective. The 9-11 attacks immediately cowed Liberals into submission and made them abandon even the mild criticism they used to throw at the Muslim world. It has NOTHING to do with any real fondness for the reactionary, superstitious savagery of Islam, it’s just that American Liberals simple-mindedly think they’re being “deep” and “intellectual” for siding with anyone perceived to be in a conflict with the United States and the rest of the Western Democracies.

Trust me, if PERUVIANS had committed the 9-11 attacks then the hilariously pretentious asses of American Liberalism would have immediately sided with Peruvians. Well, not ALL Peruvians, mind you … only the ones who advocated violence against the U.S. Peruvians who criticized Peruvian terrorism would be ignored by Liberals the way they ignore Muslims who criticize Muslim terrorism. The ONLY people that American Liberals can use as props for their distorted worldview are people hostile to the West. Continue reading

2 Comments

Filed under LIBERALS AND CONSERVATIVES

COWARDLY APOLOGISTS FOR ISLAM: SMACKING DOWN THEIR FEEBLE EXCUSES

Muhammad bombIt’s entertaining listening to the hypocritical sniveling of people who are far too cowardly to criticize the violent fanatics of Islam. The more that the latest Muslim atrocities (and they perpetrate atrocities every single day) highlight the cowardice of their enablers the louder those gutless hypocrites howl in an attempt to deflect attention from their own craven behavior.

Here are some quick smackdowns that let you, too, join in the fun of casually dismissing the wimpy excuses of these would-be Kapos who hope Muslim fanatics will attack the rest of us first and save them for last.

Gultess hypocrite Ben Affleck was happy to criticize Christians in the movie Dogma but crawls for Islam.

Gutless hypocrite Ben Affleck was happy to criticize Christians in the movie Dogma but crawls for Islam.

GUTLESS HYPOCRITE COMMENT: Dude, like, we shouldn’t like, let the actions of SOME Muslims, like, color our feelings about, like, all of the Muslim world.

SMACKDOWN: Tell them that the minute sniveling little shits like them stop acting like the actions of SOME Americans, or SOME white people, or SOME Christians or SOME cops represent the actions of ALL Americans, or ALL white people, or ALL Christians or ALL cops you’ll consider that. (HINT: Cowardly hypocrites will NEVER stop making sweeping negative generalizations about Americans or white people or Christians or cops so there is no danger of ever having to deal with a followup on this one. The reason they won’t stop? Because it’s SAFE to generalize about those targets.)

GUTLESS HYPOCRITE COMMENT: Dude, it is so totally not awesome to, like, discuss actions that would affect ALL Muslims after violent incidents that involve, like, some people who just happen to be Muslims.

SMACKDOWN: This one is just a variation of the first one (gutless hypocrites are very unoriginal thinkers). The smackdown is: So you’re saying it’s wrong to discuss actions that would affect ALL gun owners after violent incidents that involve some people who just happen to be gun owners?

Charlie Hebdo kissGUTLESS HYPOCRITE COMMENT: Dude, people shouldn’t be allowed to criticize Islam because you can’t, like, shout “fire” in a crowded theater. (This one will be accompanied by one of those looks that lets you know the gutless hypocrite who said this thinks it’s a Really Deep Thought instead of the easily dismissed excuse that it really is.)

SMACKDOWN: Yes you CAN shout “fire” in a crowded theater IF THERE’S A FIRE! Even if it APPEARS there is a fire (excessive smoke, etc) you have a responsibility to speak out so other theatergoers are made aware of the danger and can take appropriate action. Cowardly apologists for Islam act like Muslim violence is purely hypothetical and that there’s never been any real-world violence from Muslim fanatics. Continue reading

18 Comments

Filed under LIBERALS AND CONSERVATIVES

“UNWINNABLE WARS?” MUSLIM SAVAGES BRAG ABOUT BEHEADING ANOTHER NON-COMBATANT

MUSLIM FANATICS RELEASE ANOTHER BEHEADING VIDEO AS LIBERALS RENEW THEIR VOW TO PREVENT THE WESTERN DEMOCRACIES FROM EVER WINNING A WAR AGAINST SUCH FANATICS.

MUSLIM FANATICS RELEASE ANOTHER BEHEADING VIDEO AS LIBERALS RENEW THEIR VOW TO PREVENT THE WESTERN DEMOCRACIES FROM EVER WINNING A WAR AGAINST SUCH FANATICS.

Welcome back to Balladeer’s Blog, the only site that equally criticizes both Liberals and Conservatives. There was another beheading video released by the favorite people of American Liberals – Muslim religious fanatics. The fanatics claim they beheaded David Haines a British AID WORKER and said they did it as a warning to America’s allies about being dragged into allegedly “unwinnable wars”.

The expression “unwinnable wars” needs put in perspective. In modern warfare a victorious nation shows restraint and does not bombard an entire nation into submission like was done to Germany in World War Two for instance.

That restraint means that when the conventional war is won there is a sufficiently effective enemy network still at large in the defeated nations. The existence of such networks – often aided by forces outside the defeated country – means that any victorious nation needs to be prepared to maintain forces in the defeated nation for literally two decades AT LEAST.

That will not happen because the civilized world’s enemies (Muslim fanatics at present) know that as long as they can maintain ANY level of hostile activity they can count on the spineless and self-aggrandizing political left in the Western Democracies to do politically what they themselves cannot do militarily – force a premature withdrawal of the victorious forces. Continue reading

156 Comments

Filed under LIBERALS AND CONSERVATIVES

A SHOUTOUT ABOUT THE UPCOMING DECLARATION OF EQUALITIES FOR MUSLIM WOMEN

Nadia Shahram

Nadia Shahram

Nadia Shahram is the leader of the Muslim Women’s Liberation Movement. On July 18th to 19th she will be leading the discussion and signing of a Declaration of Equalities for Muslim Women at historic Seneca Falls. As an American I’m always proud to point out that the original Seneca Falls meeting of so long ago saw the signing of the figurative Declaration of Independence of American women who taylored the document to resemble America’s own Declaration of Independence. The portion that laid out their grievances against society paralleled our own Contintental Congress’ enumeration of King George III’s crimes against Americans.

It’s incredibly moving to know that these women selected this venue for their historic meeting and declaration.

Regarding the cowardly hypocrisy of so many around the world in regard to Muslim Apartheid Shahram herself says:

“I was concerned about the apathy which surrounds the plight of Muslim women. In addition to the horrific atrocities such as honor killings, stoning, acid pouring, genital mutilation, child brides, and burnings, the majority of Muslim women worldwide are also subjected to unjust laws, discrimination, and a general lack of basic human rights. Some of these include child custody, self-determination and autonomy, access to education and employment, social and cultural restriction, travel limitations, and much more.

“The legal systems and the courts have failed to protect these women. The Declaration of Equalities movement is my way (as a female lawyer) of putting pressure on these nations and governments to amend their laws and provide equal rights and protection for women.” Continue reading

21 Comments

Filed under LIBERALS AND CONSERVATIVES, Neglected History