ANOTHER COURT RULES THAT THE “CHEAT BY MAIL” CHANGES FOR THE 2020 ELECTION WERE UNCONSTITUTIONAL

Biden and Bush asterisks

“I didn’t really win mine, either.”

Add Pennsylvania to the states where courts have ruled unconstitutional the mail-in (“cheat by mail”) vote procedures unilaterally forced through by Democrat office-holders before the 2020 election. It’s no secret at this point that the long, drawn-out court procedures necessary to wade through were counted on by the Democrats, knowing that proper challenges and appeals could not be finalized before November 3rd, 2020. 

With this latest court decision (link below) we have even further support regarding the way that the 2020 presidential election was at least as corrupt and tainted as the 1876 and year 2000 presidential results. Naturally at this point we cannot go back and discard the ballots which came in improperly, or without postmark dates or which otherwise failed to meet legal standards, but Joe Biden has joined George W Bush in 2000 and Rutherford B Hayes in 1876 with an eternal asterisk by his name.

Democrat media outlets like to ignore or blow smoke over these stories just like they did with the various vote audits that have taken place in various states. They presented those vote audits as if they were recounts, not AUDITS. Those media outlets tried to make it sound as if the audits had verified the vote counts. They ignored the way those audits discovered suspect ballots which far outnumbered Joe Biden’s alleged margin of “victory” in those areas. 

FOR THE PENNSYLVANIA ACTION AND RELATED ARTICLES CLICK HERE, and HERE

20 Comments

Filed under LIBERALS AND CONSERVATIVES, Neglected History, opinion

20 responses to “ANOTHER COURT RULES THAT THE “CHEAT BY MAIL” CHANGES FOR THE 2020 ELECTION WERE UNCONSTITUTIONAL

  1. The Night Wind

    Just before the fake election day in 2020, the California Supreme Court ruled that Newsom’s voting system was illegal. Despite that ruling and massive evidence of fraud, the GOP didn’t even bother challenging California’s Electors.

  2. Reblogged this on kommonsentsjane and commented:
    Reblogged on kommonsentsjane/blogkommonsents.

    ANOTHER COURT RULES THAT THE “CHEAT BY MAIL” CHANGES FOR THE 2020 ELECTION WERE UNCONSTITUTIONAL

    Are these two – partners in crimes against the American people? Did they ever SCREW the American people – Bush I/Clinton/Bush II/Obama? When will justice be served? Only President Trump has the now how to make that happen – that is why they are “after” him.

    kommonsentsjane

    kommonsentsjane

  3. Pingback: ANOTHER COURT RULES THAT THE “CHEAT BY MAIL” CHANGES FOR THE 2020 ELECTION WERE UNCONSTITUTIONAL | kommonsentsjane

  4. haroldmarth15

    Hi,Dear nice to meet you i am Harold martha pleaseI know that it looks strange to contact whom you dont know, but i plead for your respond to my privet Email, (Haroldmartha35@gmail.com)so that we can exchange ideas for reasons

  5. Reblogged this on boudica.us and commented:
    H/T Arlin Report

  6. Any time you have more returned ballots than registered voters, there’s voter fraud going on. Democrats think if they pretend it’s not happening that nobody will notice.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s