*** It’s another installment of Transgress With Me. Like so many people here in the U.S. I used to consider myself a Liberal until American Liberals became nothing but cowardly hypocrites, pompous snobs, hilariously pretentious asses and political robots who show mindless, unquestioning obedience to the Democrat Party.
I certainly don’t fit into the category of Conservatives either, so, since neither of the two most out-of-date and increasingly meaningless political labels don’t apply to me, feel free to consider me a Socialist or a Populist or an Anarchist if you absolutely have to have a quick descriptive term.
I still wish more people would abandon these kinds of labels anyway. The best conversations I’ve had in recent years – either real-life OR online – have been with other people who set aside the outdated “shirts vs skins” attitudes of the past and simply communicate as human being to human being.
*** Never believe white Democrats about how women, people of color and gay people feel about various issues. They have a DIVERSITY of opinions and are not the monolithic “mobs with a single mind” like Democrats always try to depict groups they pretend to “own.”
*** If the Democrat and Republican Parties splintered into multiple smaller parties it might be the most peaceful way of subverting the cesspool of corruption that masquerades as our government.
*** Justifying their natural cowardice is a very large part of the life of a 21st Century American Liberal. Dressing that cowardice up as virtue is an equally large part. Pretending that their slavish conformity to the wishes of the Powers That Be is somehow “resistance” takes up the most time of all.
*** The ridiculous notion that the CIA, NSA, FBI or other parts of “the Intelligence Community” (LMAO) are anything but thuggish political operatives of the bloated rich pig class is a notion that needs abandoned.
*** The most realistic big-screen depiction of CIA trash like John Brennan, George HW Bush and their ilk may well have been Matt Damon’s character in The Good Shepherd. Especially the part where that character says that he and his self-appointed/ self-anointed Blue Bloods possess “the United States of America … the rest of you are just visiting.”
(And yes, I know who Damon’s character was really a composite of, but the pomposity of the film’s character perfectly matches the blatant class snobbery of the modern-day Intelligence Services.)
*** I like to use movie and television examples because for many people of the 21st Century American Left movies and television are more real than real-life.
*** AMERICA’S FACULTY LOUNGE FASCISTS WHO PRETEND TO BE “EDUCATORS” (LMAO) WIELD INSTITUTIONALIZED POWER, THEREFORE THEY NEED TO BE STOPPED FROM ABUSING THAT POWER BY BROWBEATING STUDENTS TO BELIEVE THEIR OUTDATED, CONFORMIST WORLDVIEW.
*** IF STANDARD OIL WAS TOO BIG AND TOO POLITICALLY CORRUPTING THEN SO ARE FACEBOOK, GOOGLE AND TWITTER.
*** PEOPLE WHO ARE EASILY OFFENDED AND LOVE ANNOUNCING THAT THEY ARE OFFENDED ARE THE MOST SIMPLE-MINDED FOOLS IN THE WORLD.
*** NEVER LISTEN TO PEOPLE WHO TRY TO DISSUADE YOU FROM READING ALL THE MATERIAL YOU WANT. THEY’RE IMPLYING YOU AREN’T CAPABLE OF SIFTING THROUGH THE INFORMATION YOURSELF.
*** PEOPLE WITH CLOSED MINDS MISTAKE SUCCESSFUL CENSORSHIP FOR “BEING IN THE RIGHT.”
*** POLITICAL ZEALOTS REVISE THEIR MYTHS ABOUT HISTORY EVEN MORE FREQUENTLY THAN RELIGIOUS ZEALOTS REVISE THE MYTHS OF THEIR RELIGION.
*** THE ” AMERICAN INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY” (LMAO) HAS PROVEN TO BE NOTHING MORE THAN THE ENFORCEMENT ARM OF BLOATED RICH PIGS AND ONE PERCENTERS.
*** Republican trash like Paul Ryan still don’t understand the fact that people who crossed party lines to vote for President Trump have not become Republicans.
*** When President Trump – our first de facto Third Party President – is gone, there will be no reason to vote for a politician with an (R) after their name, barring big changes to their party.
*** Left-wing Archie Bunkers are still fighting a version of America that hasn’t existed for decades.
Like I always say, following the path of MOST resistance is the preferable path. I don’t advocate insincere contrarianism, I mean that there’s not much point in publicly proclaiming safe viewpoints.
For instance, I was an early proponent of gay marriage. In fact I openly supported it YEARS before the weak, inept, crooked and hate-filled Barack Obama decided it was safe enough to change from opposing gay marriage – the punk even voted for the Defense of Marriage Act (LMAO) as a Senator – to supporting it.
I still support gay marriage because I think marriage is anything that a society decides that marriage is, but I no longer bother spouting off that I support it because it’s no longer daring to do so. Considering the fact that people actually get in trouble for OPPOSING gay marriage now means we’ve reached the point where it’s mere virtue signaling to drone on and on about supporting it.
Going around saying “LOOK AT ME! I SUPPORT THE SAFE POSITION!” is not being transgressive. Plus the political left now invokes absurd notions about “morality” to justify supporting gay marriage the same way the political right used to invoke absurd notions about “morality” to justify OPPOSING it.
For more examples:
*** I support Donald Trump, our de facto Third Party President. At the present time this is a transgressive position to hold because the conformist forces opposing President Trump are fascistic, close-minded hatemongers who try to inflict all manner of harm on anyone who supports him.
*** I have always despised George W Bush but that is NOT a transgressive position to hold. I could loudly proclaim my contempt for George W Bush all day long and there would be no risk involved.
JUST BECAUSE SOMETHING IS COUNTER-INTUITIVE IT DOES NOT AUTOMATICALLY MEAN IT IS “DEEP” OR “INTELLECTUAL.”
PEOPLE WHO TALK ABOUT BEING “WOKE” ARE BEING JUST AS SELF-CONGRATULATORY AS PEOPLE WHO TALK ABOUT BEING “SAVED.”
THE ABILITY TO GET ANOTHER PERSON’S OPINION CENSORED DOES NOT MEAN YOU ARE IN THE RIGHT.
+++ The concept of White Privilege is a mere social construct.
+++ Filing a complaint about everyone who says something you disagree with is NOT “activism.”
+++ Critical race theory is nothing more than bigotry with a self-created halo.
+++ People who think they’re fit to tell you what words you are allowed to use are trying to force their own narrow-minded notions of “morality” on you.
+++ The party of the Democrats has become nothing more than an organization dedicated to circumventing democracy in order to force everyone to obey their dictates.
+++ There is no such thing as “Hate Speech.”
+++ The Democrats are irrational for teaching children age 6 or younger that they can decide for themselves if they want to be the opposite sex. They wouldn’t let children that age decide they are capable of driving, so clearly there ARE physical and developmental absolutes.
+++ Colleges and universities have no business holding their kangaroo courts/ Star Chamber proceedings when a student is accused of a crime. That’s what courts of law are for and the accused is entitled to council.
+++ Women, African Americans and gay people do NOT have to obey the Democrats in order to be “authentic.”
+++ All lives matter. And it is not (yaaawwn) “racist” to say so.
+++ Preserving civil liberties from reactionary Muslim oppression will be the great Civil Rights struggle of the 21st Century.
+++ Curriculum transformation is required to stop the educational system’s misuse by fanatically partisan Democrats.
+++ The real difference today is no longer Liberals vs Conservatives, which labels have become meaningless. In 2017 the difference is between Populists vs Feudalists.
+++ Increasingly, the question that potential tourists ask themselves is “Should we go abroad and risk getting killed by Muslim fascists or stay close to home and risk getting killed by Muslim fascists?”
+++ Democrats are fine with anti-Semitism as long as it masquerades as disapproval of Israel.
10 responses to “TRANSGRESS WITH ME: MAY 28th”
I too was once a rabid Liberal and then I turned to the Center Right and now I don’t know where I am because I am getting to the point where I don’t trust much of what any politician has to say regardless of their stated affiliations.
I understand. It seems like career politicians try to circumvent the will of the voters not just here but England, Italy, etc.
I sometimes get the impression that when politicians get elected they believe they were elected to govern according to their own wills rather than according to the will of their constituencies. Something changes when they get a taste and smell of the Washington Scene.
I agree. Or they want to govern according to the will of the people who own them. There is no honest way that so many members of Congress make themselves enormously wealthy while in office.
I notice that a lot of them come out of their terms a lot richer than when they went in and I have never been able to figure out how they do that.
Because they’re white collar criminals.
That makes sense. Thank you.
These are the type of daring thoughts they should be debating in colleges.