With more and more evidence of mail-in vote fraud techniques mounting & mounting and with Senile Joe Biden’s son Hunter Biden’s dealings and alleged influence peddling being referred for criminal inquiry, Democrats have responded in the only way they know how – with violence, rioting, and with gunning down & mobbing police. More riots are sweeping the nation egged on by Joe Biden, Kamala Harris and the rest of the Democrats.
If Democrats don’t like the way an election turns out, they will spend 4 years refusing to accept the results. If Democrats don’t like the results of a Grand Jury, they will riot and burn and lie and kill. If Democrats don’t like a potential appointee to the Supreme Court, they will riot and burn and lie and kill.
So, Democrats are basically threatening the country by saying “If we don’t like the results of the election this year expect more of this.” In fact, reasonable people can’t help but ask:
WILL DEMOCRATS CONJURE UP AN EXCUSE TO LAUNCH RIOTS IN CLOSELY-CONTESTED OR TRUMP-FRIENDLY VOTING PRECINCTS TO PREVENT VOTERS FROM HAVING ACCESS TO THE POLLS ON ELECTION DAY? We’ve seen how quickly they whip up their fascist mobs into a destructive frenzy.
WILL THE DEMOCRATS’ MEDIA OUTLETS POUNCE ON SITUATIONS WHERE, SAY, VOTERS WITH IMPROPER ID ARE TURNED AWAY FROM THE VOTING AREAS AND BLOW THEM OUT OF ALL PROPORTION LIKE THEY DO WITH POLICE SHOOTINGS IN ORDER TO CAUSE RIOTS AND SHUT DOWN THOSE POLLING PLACES?
WILL WE SEE A SITUATION LIKE IN THE 1876 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION, AND HAVE MULTIPLE STATES TURNING IN CONTRADICTORY ELECTION RESULTS, PROMPTING A COMMITTEE TO BE APPOINTED TO DECIDE THE ELECTION? In the 1876 results, on an 8 to 7 vote in such a committee, Rutherford B Hayes was declared the winner, though Samuel Tilden in all likelihood was the real winner. (The election could not be sent to the House to decide because of the way multiple states had submitted contradictory election results.)
WILL THE DEMOCRATS EVER AGAIN ACCEPT ANY PEACEFUL TRANSFER OF POWER WHEN THEY LOSE? THEY STILL HAVEN’T ACCEPTED THEIR 2016 LOSS YET
WILL DEMOCRATS PIONEER NEW UGLINESS IN WHICH – JUST TO AVOID OPEN CIVIL WAR – THE OBVIOUS WINNER OF A PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION MUST NEGOTIATE IN ADVANCE, SURRENDERING PRESIDENTIAL PREROGATIVES BEFORE BEING “PERMITTED” TO HAVE THEIR REELECTION OKAYED BY DEMOCRAT FASCISTS?