DEMOCRATS AND THE NEW YORK TIMES SHOCKED TO LEARN THAT LEGAL IMMIGRANTS OPPOSE ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION

latinos-for-trump-4-came-here-legallyBalladeer’s Blog has often covered former Democrats like myself who left the Democrat Party because of how out of touch they are with the real world.

The polls that Democrats, Carlos Slim’s New York Times and Left-Wing Archie Bunkers from the 1960s generation live by showed that LEGAL immigrants were crucial in defeating the attempt to extend Illegal Immigrant Colonies  – propagandistically called “Sanctuary Cities” by Democrats and La Raza (Racists Without Borders) to Maryland.

Democrats are such condescending fools that they were ESPECIALLY stunned that LEGAL Hispanic Immigrants overwhelmingly opposed Illegal Immigrant Colonies. Last year’s election results still haven’t sunk in to the snobbish, pompous Democrats and their virtual House Organ the New York Times.  

latinos-for-trump-3Stephen Crowder had a terrific look at this. The link is below but first some excerpts:  

“Democrats have gone all in as the party of illegal immigrants. You know who has an issue with that? Legal immigrants … ”

“It bears repeating because many a leftist twit conflates illegal immigrants with legal immigrants. But as this story shows, ’tis not so.” (Note from Balladeer: I’m sure we’ve all gotten plenty of laughs from the grand and pompous way that Democrats love to say “We are a nation of immigrants,” conveniently forgetting the difference between legal and illegal immigration.) “

“The New York Times is shocked and appalled that folks with different racial backgrounds, hailing from different countries, aren’t rubber-stamping the idea of “All people welcome here with nary a process.” This erroneous liberal thought process is likely due to an expectation that all brown people believe whatever a Democrat tells them. Which, dare I say it, is a teensy bit racist. But hey, I’m not here to insinuate.”

latinos-for-trump-2Cluelessly expressing their exasperation with LEGAL Hispanic Immigrants the New York Times continued in this same condescending vein: “Their objections stunned Democratic supporters of sanctuary here and helped bring about the bill’s demise in March. A similar proposal for the state collapsed this month in the Maryland Senate, where Democrats also hold a two-to-one advantage. Some of the same immigrants spoke out against it.”

And the crowning stupidity from Carlos Slim’s Times:

“The failure of the sanctuary bills in Maryland reveals a potentially troublesome fissure for Democrats as they rush to defy Mr. Trump. Their party has staked out an activist position built around protecting undocumented immigrants. But it is one that has alienated many who might have been expected to support it.” ONLY AMERICAN LIBERAL MORONS WOULD EXPECT  THEM TO SUPPORT IT!

FOR THE LINK TO STEPHEN CROWDER’S FULL ITEM CLICK HERE

FOR MORE ON LIBERALS AND CONSERVATIVES CLICK HERE:    https://glitternight.com/category/liberals-and-conservatives/

© Edward Wozniak and Balladeer’s Blog 2017. Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this blog’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Edward Wozniak and Balladeer’s Blog with appropriate and specific direction to the original content. 

Advertisements

6 Comments

Filed under LIBERALS AND CONSERVATIVES, Neglected History, opinion

6 responses to “DEMOCRATS AND THE NEW YORK TIMES SHOCKED TO LEARN THAT LEGAL IMMIGRANTS OPPOSE ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION

  1. i had a sneaky suspicion that you lean to the right when you discontinued bashing both sides. this is ok as i agree with a lot that you mentiion about the demos and i sure hope they change their tone soon or i just might become a libertarian.

    • Hello! Always good to hear from you! Actually, as I often whine about, I get accused of being BOTH right-leaning AND left-leaning.
      I started out as a leftwing Democrat but they have betrayed everything they used to stand for.

      I didn’t become a Republican because I disagree with most of their stands. I never became a Libertarian either because Libertarians want to do away with Social Security, Medicare and other social programs.

      I favor a mixture of socialism AND capitalism – think of the U.S. around the early 70s or so. I think a nice balance had been struck by then but afterward things got ugly. I call myself a Populist or a Socialist or an Anarchist but never a Liberal or a Conservative.

      And I still bash both sides, but in a blog post on illegal immigration I can’t help but trash the Democrats more.

  2. Lab Guy

    I listen to talk radio here South Texas. Contrary to Democratic Party fantasies, not every Mexican American wants illegal hordes coming into to the country.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s