INDIANA JONES REBOOT RUMORS

The buzz surrounding the planned reboot of Indiana Jones reminded me of my blog post from five and a half years ago. That post was prompted by the news that Steven Spielberg declined to direct the upcoming fifth movie in the Indiana Jones franchise –  

Chris Pratt“In the past I’ve mentioned how foolish it is to think that Harrison Ford MUST play Indy in all the movies. James Bond and Tarzan are just two recurring heroes that have survived multiple casting changes over the years.

“The obvious move long ago would have been to cast a younger actor – say, Chris Pratt – as Indiana Jones and detail some of his earlier adventures. I love the Roaring Twenties so I think it would have been great to see Dr. Jones’ activities in that decade.

“Since it would be before Raiders of the Lost Ark even Belloq (maybe Gary Oldman) could appear in a few installments. I can’t possibly be alone in wanting to see some of those “many stimulating encounters” that Belloq referred to having with Indy in Raiders.

“Belloq was French, so do a story with Dr. Jones searching for a lost relic in 1920s Vietnam. Belloq’s hoity-toity family could be among the French plantation owners there, helping to set up a clash with our hero. Or have the two vying with each other to recover ancient Russian artifacts from violent factions of Red and White Russians in the years after the Russian Civil War. Any number of things.

Mascot sword and pistol“One of the main things I hate about keeping Harrison Ford as Indy is the fact that Ford’s age requires the setting to be the 1950s or 1960s. Those decades are far too late for the “homage to 1930s pulp and serial heroes” charm of the original Indiana Jones trilogy.

“If you don’t like the thought of recasting the role, well, back in 2008, instead of the awful Kingdom of the Crystal Skulls, they could have made Son of Indiana Jones. Chris Pratt – or anyone else NOT named Shia Lebouf, who is shia venny talent – could have been the son of Indy and Marion, named Gemini Jones or Mercury Jones or something similar.

“The opening could have been set at a celebration Indy and Marion threw for their son in honor of him getting his PhD in physics or another science. We’d still have a “Doctor Jones” as the hero, but him being a scientist would have gone with the theme of the continuation of the franchise.

“That theme? Paying homage to the 1950s sci-fi and/or monster flicks to substitute for the homage to 1930s pulps and serials that Pappy Jones’ adventures represented. The new Doctor Jones could clash with aliens, campy Commies or even “American Kaiju” figures like Big Bugs or an amazing colossal man or two. He’d be a more action-oriented Captain Z-Ro or Quatermass-type.  

“This way, with Harrison Ford and Karen Allen appearing in small supporting roles to pass the torch as the hero’s parents, it would still count as the same franchise but with storylines updated to the 1950s. For hypersensitive people who fret over Indiana Jones searching for relics from non-white cultures that story element would be gone for good but would be seamlessly replaced with this sci-fi focus of his son’s stories.

“If Indy and Marion had married in 1936 their son Gemini or Mercury could be getting their PhD in, say, 1957. I know that’s VERY young to be getting a doctorate but the Son of Indiana Jones could be depicted as a prodigy who entered college in his early teens and was getting his PhD at age 21.

“Hell, a continuation of the Jones Family franchise could have kept going into the 1960s and 1970s by having Gemini or Mercury’s younger brother or sister becoming an American intelligence agent for ‘American James Bond’ spy adventures in those decades.

“And why stop there? Gemini or Mercury’s son or daughter could be in the 1980s military for adventures of their own being done as homages to 1980s patriotic action movies like those of Chuck Norris or Sly Stallone or even Arnie.    

“At any rate, I feel that keeping Indiana Jones chained to the mummified Harrison Ford is doing a huge disservice to the character.”

© Edward Wozniak and Balladeer’s Blog, 2020. Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this blog’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Edward Wozniak and Balladeer’s Blog with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

10 Comments

Filed under opinion, Pulp Heroes

10 responses to “INDIANA JONES REBOOT RUMORS

  1. Pingback: INDIANA JONES REBOOT RUMORS – El Noticiero de Alvarez Galloso

  2. Agreed. And if they paid Harrison Ford enough to bow out, I doubt he’d even care.

  3. I think some of these franchises need to die once and for all. “”The Walking Dead,” “Jaws,” “Indiana Jones,” “Jurassic Park,” etc. Come up with something new!

  4. Java Bean: “Ayyy, we think they should do a film featuring the adventures of the very first, original Indiana Jones!”Charlee: “And that would be … ?”Lulu: “His dog, of course.”

    • That’s such a good idea I’m surprised they never made a story about really young Henry Jones, Jr. and a Lassie/ Rin Tin Tin style adventure with his beloved dog, Indiana!

  5. Pingback: Sensor Sweep: Red Sonja, Bradbury, Tolkien, Star Wolf – castaliahouse.com

Leave a comment