MISTER SCROOGE (1964)

Time for another post in Balladeer’s Blog’s Eighth annual orgy of entries on various versions of A Christmas Carol.  

Mr Scrooge

MR SCROOGE (1964) – Regular readers of Balladeer’s Blog will remember the bizarre lengths I go to in order to track down every Carol that I can. This is one of those “don’t ask” situations. I don’t want to become an international criminal. (I’m kidding … maybe.)

Mr Scrooge was originally broadcast on December 21st, 1964 by the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation. It runs just an hour and stars Cyril Ritchard as Ebenezer Scrooge and the very appropriately named Eric Christmas as Marley’s Ghost. As with the  1978 Canadian telefilm Scrooge the budget is very tight on this production, but even with that AND the fact that Mr Scrooge is in black & white I can definitely say this 1964 venture is more touching and has more of a festive air to it than the 1978 version.

CyrilAsHookCyril Ritchard was famed for playing Captain Hook to Mary Martin’s Peter Pan on Broadway and plays a Scrooge who is almost uniquely aristocratic. Think George C Scott’s portrayal crossed with a suave James Bond villain and you’ve got Ritchard’s Scrooge.

The low budget and short running time result in each of the three Christmas Ghosts only transporting Scrooge to one location each during their visits, so I’d have eliminated the fairly bland songs to allow for more expansive storytelling.

The best part of this version of the Carol would be the depiction of said ghosts. We viewers get three of the most memorable phantasmal visitors from any presentation this side of Rich Little’s. The Ghost of Christmas Past rides a penny-farthing bicycle (insert your own Prisoner joke here) and has Scrooge ride with him back in time.

The Ghost of Christmas Present is a drunken British soldier who seems equal parts Dudley Moore in Arthur and Peter O’Toole in My Favorite Year. His uniform clearly doesn’t fit but I don’t know if that’s intentional or not.

The biggest visual treat (and trick) is the Ghost of Christmas Yet To Come, a decapitated spectre whose eeriness is enhanced by the fact that he carries his head under his arm. The creepy  image this presents more than makes up for the fact that this is one of those Carols that has this ghost talk Scrooge’s ear off rather than be silent like in the novel.

About the only complaint I have, aside from the short running time and its resulting “rushed” feel, is the fact that the creative team behind this effort didn’t make the Ghost of Christmas Past a female figure. In the novel Dickens describes that spirit as being of indeterminate gender, so it’s amazing how many versions of the Carol fail to exploit this way of providing a major female role that doesn’t feel forced.

Overall, though, Mr Scrooge is pretty enjoyable and if forced to rank it on a scale from one to ten I’d give it a seven. 

FOR MORE VERSIONS OF A CHRISTMAS CAROL CLICK HERE: https://glitternight.com/category/a-christmas-carol-2/  

© Edward Wozniak and Balladeer’s Blog, 2011. Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this blog’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Edward Wozniak and Balladeer’s Blog with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Advertisements

1 Comment

Filed under A CHRISTMAS CAROL

One response to “MISTER SCROOGE (1964)

  1. Garrett Kieran

    I, like so many people, know Cyril Ritchard primarily as Captain Hook, as well as the voice of Elrond in the Rankin/Bass version of “The Hobbit”. I would be interested to see how he does as Scrooge. But all that about the not very good songs getting in the way of the story makes it sound kind of like the not too satisfying Frederic March version. The spirits sure sound interesting, and personally, I don’t have a problem with a masculine Ghost of Christmas Past. I’m pretty open minded to how that ghost in depicted.

    In Fred Guida’s book, it’s indicated that both Scrooge’s nephew and the charity solicitors are eliminated. So, without them, I can’t help wondering how the opening office scene went.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s