ANCIENT GREEK COMEDIES: DIONYSALEXANDROS (C: 430’s BCE)

For this 5th installment of my posts on Ancient Greek Comedies I’ll examine Dionysalexandros by Cratinus. For my post providing background info on ancient Greek comedies click here: https://glitternight.com/2011/09/22/at-long-last-my-ancient-greek-comedy-posts-begin/

Cratinus was one of the Big 3 in Attic Old Comedy along with Aristophanes and Eupolis, both of whom were much younger than he was. I chose Dionysalexandros as the first of his comedies to examine because it is a brilliant and, from the fragmentary evidence available on all non-Aristophanic comedies, a bold and possibly unique hybrid of Attic Old Comedy and traditional Satyr Plays.   

THE PLAY

In Dionysalexandros Cratinus pushed the envelope by  blurring the line between comedy and Satyr Plays, which were the traditional mythical burlesques that the ancient Greek tragedians wrote as a comical piece after each of their tragic trilogies. (“Anything further, father?”)

Satyr plays always featured Dionysus’ followers the satyrs, the drunken Silenus and often Dionysus himself. As in the comedies Dionysus would be depicted in Satyr Plays as a bumbler and a coward, because though the tragedies and comedies were part of the festivals devoted to that god he was able to laugh at himself. Now that’s the kind of god I could get behind!

At any rate the tragedians would write the satyrs and their divine leader into traditional myths for comic effect. Think of Simpsons episodes where the characters were written into classical stories or movies. Satyr Plays were, according to some scholars, the origin of the word satire, but others dispute this. (Scholars arguing over something? Big surprise!) 

In Dionysalexandros Cratinus used the Satyr Play format for political commentary about Pericles, his conduct of the war (see below), his mistress Aspasia and her new lover Lysicles. Dionysus was impersonating the shepherd Paris and his satyrs were impersonating Paris’ subordinate shepherds.

The opening fragment of the comedy has not survived, so it is not known why they were doing this. Dionysus as Paris (AKA Alexander, hence the title) is mistaken for the real thing and is enlisted to make the milestone Judgement of Paris, deciding which Olympian goddess deserved the golden apple inscribed “To the most fair”. 

The comedies and Satyr Plays performed in the Theater of Dionysus were the only arena in which such disrespect for the gods was permitted and the ancient writers threw themselves into crafting comic versions of various sacred moments from their own belief system. It would be like if solemn Christian Easter observances included a screening of Monty Python’s Life of Brian or if a comedy about Muhammed was made without Muslims advocating or enacting the murder of all the participants. (Yeah, that’ll happen)

For this burlesque of the Judgement of Paris Cratinus had the competing goddesses try to sway “Paris” with sarcastic twists on their actual bribes from that myth. Hera, who offered him the rule of the world in the myth was here depicted as offering to make our impersonator dictator for life  with wry jabs at the type of abuse of power Pericles was often accused of. 

Athena, who offered the real Paris success in warfare was depicted as instead offering the trembling impersonator the basic courage just to be able to face the battlefield, a poke at Dionysus’ depiction as a coward in the comedies.

Aphrodite keeps true to her offer of “the greatest beauty in the world” but the comic twist on that offer is that Dionysus, in his usual vain, fey way in comedy thinks she is instead offering to MAKE HIM the greatest beauty in the world. Unable to resist such an offer, Dionysus/Paris judges Aphrodite to be the most fair.

More comedy results from the imposter ending up with the voluptuous and emminently desirable Helen instead of the physical beauty he wanted for himself. This would be played for the type of laughs that a modern audience would get out of the tableau of (insert name of the most famous gay guy of the moment) ending up with (insert name of the most famous female sexpot of the moment). Dionysus, like most Greek deities, oinked and boinked with both men   and women, but in comedy he could be portrayed as just going “one way” to make whatever kind of joke the comic author wanted. 

To begin to wrap things up, the Greeks are depicted as marauding all over the countryside near Mt Ida trying to recover the shanghaied Helen and punish her captor, causing the cowardly Dionysus to transform himself into a donkey in order to hide from the search parties. The ancient Greeks were so skilled at stagecraft I would love to know by what means this transformation was presented. It probably brought the house down.

The real Paris shows up, figures out what has been going on, and turns the reluctant Dionysus over to … somebody. From the fragmentary evidence some claim he is turned over to the Greeks but others claim he is turned over to the competing goddesses from earlier to face punishment.

Whatever fate is in store for him, his satyrs pretend they will share it with him, only to abandon him, as Pericles’ hangers-on and unfaithful associates abandoned him when trouble arose. Helen tells the real Paris she doesn’t want to go back to her husband Menelaus, and so, presumably with a leer, Paris agrees to take her with him to Troy, where as we all know, the Trojan War will be waged for the next 10 years.  

COMMENTS

 Cratinus was considered “the grand old man” of comedy by Aristophanes and Eupolis’ generation. In the ancient sources he is credited with having imposed some organization over the anarchic emerging art form of comedy following Susarion’s (supposed) pioneering of the craft around 500 BCE  or earlier. He may have written as many as 29 comedies in a career that spanned from approximately 457 BCE to 423 BCE.     

Typical of academic arguments over the precise facts behind activity in ancient Athens some sources state that Cratinus, who usually attacked his targets openly, was forced to use Dionysus as an allegorical equivalent of Pericles in Dionysalexandros. The reason for that would be that the comedy was (or was not) written during the period (or periods) in which the brassy Greek comic poets were briefly forbidden by law to attack public figures by name.      

Putting Pericles in the role of Paris, the person whose desire for Helen was most responsible for the outbreak of the Trojan War, was a comedic way of  attacking Pericles for embroiling the Athenian Empire in either the Peloponnesian War or the Samian War, depending on which scholar and which assigned date for the comedy you go along with.

Public sentiment in Athens often blamed Aspasia, Pericles’ mistress, for being the statesman’s motive for winding up at war. Full explanations would take too long but suffice it to say she was considered by some critics to have too much influence over Pericles’ policies, especially where her homeland of Mileta was concerned. Thus, “Helen” in this comedy would have represented Aspasia, just as Dionysus/Paris represented Pericles. 

Dionysus’ cowardly reluctance to go forth and face the hostile army is a joke about Pericles’ disastrous policy during the early years of the Peloponnesian War of simply withdrawing behind the gates of Athens rather than face the attacking Spartans in the open. This policy of Pericles, founded on the statesman’s belief that Athenian armies stood no chance against Spartans in the open field, meant that the Spartan armies were free to ravage the towns and homes in the Athenian countryside for a few months every year.

Pericles felt that Athens could instead use its naval superiority to Sparta to win the war through battles on the open sea or by naval and marine corps raids on the city- states allied with Sparta during the war. Of course, for people who date the comedy to the Samian War instead, those jokes are figments of the first group’s imaginations. Ah, academia!   

For scholars who maintain that Dionysalexandros was not written until after Pericles was dead, many jokes are interpreted as jabs at Lysicles, the public figure that Aspasia took up with soon after Pericles’ death. Aspasia was rumored to have coached Lysicles on his speaking style as she had, according to some sources, coached Pericles before him.  

For my review of Eupolis’ comedy Demoi click here: https://glitternight.com/2011/10/14/ancient-greek-comedy-demoi-c-417-bce/ 

And for all my ancient Greek comedy posts click here: https://glitternight.com/ancient-greek-comedies/  

© Edward Wozniak and Balladeer’s Blog, 2011. Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this blog’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Edward Wozniak and Balladeer’s Blog with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

30 Comments

Filed under Ancient Greek Comedy

30 responses to “ANCIENT GREEK COMEDIES: DIONYSALEXANDROS (C: 430’s BCE)

  1. You really make these ancient works come alive. Can’t wait for the next one!

  2. Woman

    Why is it, whenever I see the name “Lysicles” I always want a popscile?

  3. Ha! Because you’re pleasantly eccentric!

  4. i never would have thought things written that long ago would seem so relevant. These reviews are fascinating.

  5. This is such an interesting bunch of reviews. I didn’t know comedy going back that far would be so sophisticated. What happened?

  6. I luv this blog and ur greek posts … my teachers asked me how i know so much about these old comedies and i told them to check out ur blog and they loved it …

  7. You make these plays seem so modern and so interesting. You should do more of these and less sports!

  8. These ancient comedies are so incredibly interesting! I really love your way of making them relevant.

  9. “Yeah, that’ll happen” Congrats on being brave enough to point these things out! Are you married?

  10. This is the best one of the posts on Greek comedies so far. Love them all!

  11. I am really enjoying these looks at old comedies … who knew they laughed at so many of the same kind of thin as we do?

  12. You are getting me addicted to reading about ancient Greek comedies. I bought a copy of the complete plays of Aristophanes because of you! I hope it’s as interesting as your blog posts!

  13. You open up a whole new world with these. In college these old comedies sounded so incredibly dull but you have a great way of making them seem relevant and very funny and easy to relate to today.

  14. Really nice. And you’re right, Islam would never be open-minded enough to allow satire of itself.

  15. Pingback: Knock knock … knock | The House of Vines

  16. Pingback: new wine into old goatskins « The House of Vines

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s